# REVIEW FLAGS — videos (2026-07-08)
*QA agent crew ran 2026-07-09 03:04 — full QA (incl. temporal coherence) + owner lens. Gregory sees nothing without this report.*

## FINALIST_kling.mp4
**Crew verdict: FAIL**  (QA FAIL 82%)
- coherence: FAIL score=20
  - frames 1-3: Head-body coupling: The head rotates significantly to the left across these frames, while the torso remains largely static, creating an unnatural and disconnected movement.
  - frames 1-4: Identity lock: The woman's face morphs significantly across all frames, particularly noticeable in the jawline, chin, and eye shape, making her appear as a different person in subsequent frames.
  - frames 2-3: The drape and folds of the dress fabric on the lap and around the left leg (viewer's right) change abruptly and unnaturally, revealing more leg in frame 3.
  - frames 3-4: Abrupt change in body posture from a crouched position to a more upright stance, feeling like a jump cut rather than a smooth, continuous motion.
  - frames 3-4: Garment pattern and drape on the skirt change drastically and unnaturally; patterns warp, shift, and re-materialize, and the overall fit and waistline appear different.
  - frames 3-4: The arm positions abruptly change, particularly the right arm moving from being down and slightly back to bent and lifted forward, and the left arm lifting to hold the dress. This creates a 'pop' rather than a smooth, continuous motion, breaking limb continuity.
  - frames 3-4: The body posture shifts significantly from seated to a more upright/leaning position, but the dress fabric on the lap completely flattens and changes its folds and pattern alignment in an abrupt, non-physical manner. The left leg (viewer's right) goes from partially exposed to almost entirely covered by the dress in a single jump.
  - frames 3-4: The head's relatively minor adjustment does not fully align with the significant shift in the body's posture, indicating poor head-body coupling.
- B3_anatomy: FAIL — Subtle facial morphing/warping, particularly around the jawline and mouth, which subtly changes shape between frames.
- OWNER LENS: would_run=False score=35.0
  - **BLOCKER**: Lack of distinct backgrounds. All scenes use the exact same backdrop, violating the rule that every scene must have a distinct background. This makes the video appear cheap and unvaried. (All frames)
  - minor: Repetitive pose between frames 4 and 5. The sitting position and hand placement are nearly identical, with only a slight head turn and camera angle change. (Frames 4 and 5)

## FINALIST_runway.mp4
**Crew verdict: FAIL**  (QA FAIL 64%)
- coherence: FAIL score=25
  - frames 1-4: Head remains rigidly camera-locked while the body moves forward and shifts weight, creating an unnatural, floating head effect.
- B_smooth_warp: FAIL — Feet appear soft and blurry, lacking realistic anatomical detail. The model is barefoot or wearing extremely sheer hosiery in a shoes-expected setting., Footwear: The model is barefoot in a shoes-expected setting (concrete stairs), and the feet appear somewhat rubbery and unnatural., Model is barefo
- B3_anatomy: FAIL — Garment morphing/warping: The dress fabric around the left leg significantly changes shape and volume between frames, appearing to billow out and stretch in an unnatural manner, rather than simply flowing with movement.
- B5_reality: FAIL — The 'VK VERKRAFTY' logo in the top right corner jitters slightly in position between frames 1, 2, and 3. Between frames 3 and 4, it shifts significantly to the right and slightly up, and its color changes from black and white to black and red.
- OWNER LENS: would_run=False score=31.7
  - **BLOCKER**: Every scene must have a distinct, realistic background. This video uses the exact same backdrop (white stairs and column) for all frames, which makes it look cheap and uninspired, not premium. (All frames)